tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-273593670040001243.post806747126262622886..comments2008-06-05T23:35:18.852-07:00Daniel Ehrenberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00902922561603041049noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-273593670040001243.post-63063132646888537622008-06-05T23:35:00.000-07:002008-06-05T23:35:00.000-07:00doug,<BR/><BR/>Yes, I'm aware of ICU. The reason I started reimplementing everything in ICU is to use a fixed-width encoding internally rather than UTF-16, as this makes the user's view of strings simpler. Also, this is partly an experiment to see if all of this can be done cleanly (ICU is not very clean or readable code, in my opinion).Daniel Ehrenberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00902922561603041049noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-273593670040001243.post-10318618708681136392008-06-05T23:22:00.000-07:002008-06-05T23:22:00.000-07:00I just ran across this by accident, and I was interested that you're working on implementing Unicode support. Have you looked at the ICU project? It implements the Unicode algorithms in C and uses the most current Unicode data. But it might be too large for what you want to do.Doug Feltnoreply@blogger.com